{"id":3062,"date":"2022-08-04T07:58:24","date_gmt":"2022-08-04T11:58:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/?p=3062"},"modified":"2022-08-04T08:01:47","modified_gmt":"2022-08-04T12:01:47","slug":"professor-barry-wimpfheimer-remembers-rabbi-halivni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/2022\/08\/professor-barry-wimpfheimer-remembers-rabbi-halivni\/","title":{"rendered":"Professor Barry Wimpfheimer Remembers Rabbi Halivni"},"content":{"rendered":"

The following article was originally published by the Columbia’s Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies<\/a> (original link, pdf format<\/a>).\u00a0 It is reprinted here with the author’s permission.<\/em><\/p>\n

Professor Barry Scott Wimpfheimer \u00a0is Associate Professor of Religious Studies and Law at Northwestern University, where he also serves as Director of the Crown Family Center for Jewish and Israel Studies. Wimpfheimer received rabbinical ordination at Yeshiva University and a Ph.D in Religion at Columbia University. His Massive Open Online Course entitled \u201cThe Talmud: A Methodological Introduction\u201d is available here<\/a>.\u00a0 His books\u00a0The Talmud: A Biography and\u00a0Narrating the Law: A Poetics of Talmudic Legal Stories are available on Amazon here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

This morning I woke up to the news that my Columbia doctoral adviser Professor David Weiss Halivni had passed away in Jerusalem. His loss is devastating, but we\u2019ve been losing him for a few years already. I\u2019ve visited him twice in the last few years and left saddened by the realization that this intellectual giant, world renowned for his memory, could no longer remember me. During my most recent visit, this past November, Halivni was in good physical health and could speak with some difficulty. He had a volume of the Vilna Shas (the standard print edition of the Talmud) in front of him, but it was closed, and he apologetically told me that he hadn\u2019t been making progress on his Talmudic commentary Meqorot Umesorot<\/em>\u2014a multi-volume work that he began in the 1960\u2019s and covers 75% of the vast Talmud. This was the first time that he didn\u2019t proudly tell me that his most recent Talmudic analysis required a complete rethinking of everything he\u2019d said before about the Talmud. I left the meeting thinking that it was likely the last time I\u2019d see him in person.<\/p>\n

David Weiss Halivni was an immensely impactful intellectual, theologian, and pastoral counselor and none of those descriptions measure up to his identity as an Auschwitz survivor. Like his Sighet neighbor and childhood acquaintance Elie Wiesel, he will forever be identified as a survivor who was also an intellectual, theologian and counselor. And he didn\u2019t mind it. He lost every close relative in the Holocaust, and personally suffered the indignities of Auschwitz as an orphaned teenager. The experience lived with him in perpetuity. I remember his apologetic mumble about the impact of starvation when we attended an event with a catered buffet, and he took three times as much food on his plates than he could ever finish. Though his Meqorot Umesorot<\/em> was unquestionably his magnum opus, he was proud of his published work as a theologian and, in recent years, of the post-Holocaust theology that he produced in dialogue with Peter Ochs<\/a>. It thrilled him when his Holocaust memoir, The Book and the Sword<\/a>, was published in Italian.<\/p>\n

Halivni was an old-world person who grew up without indoor plumbing, telephones and automobiles. His childhood education was limited to the traditional Jewish canon, and he made the jump from Bible to Mishnah and Talmud at a very young age. In a traditional world that valued Talmudic study above all else and panned for child prodigies, Halivni (then Weiss) was acknowledged an Ilui (prodigy) at a young age. Wiesel often recalled the ways that established Sighet townspeople would defer to Halivni and offer him favors and rides.<\/p>\n

The Talmud has been a Jewish intellectual playground for the last millennium. This layered work composed of several generations of conversation among rabbis, simultaneously serves as a comprehensive revision of earlier Jewish knowledge and sets in its place a robust polyvocal and multi-generic dialogue that ranges across all possible Jewish topics of interest and came to constitute the discursive space inhabited by a millennium of legal scholars struggling to distill applicable principles and guidance. Religious insiders have been known to spend a lifetime of days and nights exclusively studying the Talmud and its reception materials (codes, commentary and responsa); it is an act at once intellectual and ritual. Halivni combined the diligence of a religious scholar\u2014the commitment to study this material day and night for a lifetime\u2014with a critical sensibility that motivated him to step outside the traditional discourse and discover new insights about how and when the Talmud came to be composed. Textual criticism involves both lower criticism (attention to variants and philology) and higher criticism (attention to redaction and the chronology of composition). Halivni\u2019s encyclopedic command of the entire Talmud and its commentarial corpus allowed him to do a unique form of textual criticism that will never be repeated.<\/p>\n

As an adolescent, Halivni passed a nodl farher<\/em>–a talmudic pin test. The pin test was a legendary way of demonstrating a young person\u2019s Talmudic prowess\u2014or at least their memory. The test asks that one identify the word that occupies a location of the pin on a randomly selected page of Talmud. There are 2711 double sided pages of Talmud. In my lifetime I\u2019ve known people of prodigious memory. I\u2019ve met people with photographic recall of Talmudic pages. They could reproduce a few words or lines from memory when given a citation. Compared to what Halivni could do, this is but a parlor trick.<\/p>\n

Halivni not only had the Talmudic text memorized, he had instant recall of the deeper logical debates that surround every such Talmudic text. What\u2019s more, he had the unique ability to reprocess all of it in a seeming instant. When I studied with him in graduate school, I had the Bar Ilan Responsa CD burned onto my hard drive, and I could perform sophisticated word searches of the Talmud. Students would sometimes ask the type of question that a word search could generate. Halivni would answer faster than the computer and with an accuracy rate that was near 100%. More significantly, though, students would sometimes ask questions of second order analysis\u2014e.g. how common is it for a sixth generation Babylonian amora to disagree with the midrashic reading of a fourth generation amora? These questions, which would require much more work to get out of a computer, would be answered by Halivni with the same speed.<\/p>\n

The ability to reprocess the entire Talmud led Halivni to constantly challenge his own prior work in order to produce a stronger theory of talmudic composition. Each introduction to Meqorot Umesorot<\/em> uses the examples of that volume to reconsider fundamental questions of dating and the techniques through which the Talmud was constituted. Halivni\u2019s critical mind meant that every new in-depth analysis could force him to reconsider all the examples he had already processed in earlier volumes. The commentary footnotes bear ample evidence of this revision.<\/p>\n

By the time I began to study with Professor Halivni, he was already a living legend on multiplelevels. It took me some time to get used to his habit of citing the page numbers of Meqorot Umesorot <\/em>as if they were the Talmud itself. Meqorot Umesorot <\/em>is a critical commentary on the Babylonian Talmud. Halivni claimed that it is the first critical commentary on the Talmud. (I\u2019m not sure that\u2019s fair to the Hagahot Dinarnow<\/span> published as Hiddushe HaRitzad<\/em>). Meqorot Umesorot<\/em> is a monumental achievement, covering a significant majority of Talmudic tractates. Halivni\u2019s method is selective\u2014unlike his younger colleague and rival Shamma Friedman (also my teacher \u05dd\u05d9\u05d9\u05d7\u05dc \u05dc\u05d3\u05d1\u05d9) whose commentarial method accounts for every word of every passage, Halivni homes in on the aspects of a Talmudic passage that catch his critical eye. Often, these are the moments in the passage that possess logical hiccups (that he called \u201cmaculations\u201d) or lend themselves to historical inquiry. And they definitively respond to late nineteenth and early twentieth century rabbinic scholarly predecessors who weren\u2019t necessarily critics but were, like Halivni, engaged in an attempt to establish the proper meaning of the text in an historically responsible way. Halivni studied Talmud all day and into the night. The Talmud was always open and so was the word processor. In graduate school I was Halivni\u2019s technical support, a role that I suspect other students had played in the years before me. He never quite learned how to deal with attachments, but he proudly typed his own commentary into the computer.<\/p>\n

Three years ago, I visited Halivni in his home after he had had a stroke. I was saddened to encounter him in a diminished capacity. He didn\u2019t remember me and had trouble speaking. It wasn\u2019t clear to me that he remembered his family members. Much of the meeting was a one-way dialogue; I was speaking, and he would sometimes nod or smile in recognition. After a few minutes I told him about my book The Talmud: A Biograph<\/a>y and I offered to share a textual insight I had produced while studying the Talmudic section about the tort of fire damage. To my delight, Halivni perked up and the million-dollar smile reappeared. My teacher was back in front of me. He stuttered and stammered but managed to communicate the page citation for the Talmud\u2019s discussion. As I began to discuss the topic, Halivni\u2019s eyes lit up and I could see not only comprehension but deep immersion. I could tell that he had things to say but was unable to communicate. I left with sadness and the realization that Halivni\u2019s Talmud memory was deeper than other things in his mind\u2014like muscle memory or mame-loshn<\/em>. I also realized the depths to which his soul was existentially connected with the Talmud\u2014as if the Talmud lived in his body. Last November, I tried to share textual insights to see if I could bring my teacher back. There was no reaction\u2014no smile or glimmer of the eyes\u2014and I knew that I had already lost him.<\/p>\n\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The following article was originally published by the Columbia’s Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies (original link, pdf format).\u00a0 It is reprinted here with the author’s permission. Professor Barry Scott Wimpfheimer \u00a0is Associate Professor of Religious Studies and Law at Northwestern University, where he also serves as Director of the Crown Family Center for Jewish Continue Reading »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":45,"featured_media":3036,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,158],"tags":[],"coauthors":[123],"class_list":["post-3062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-modern-judaism","category-remembering-rabbi-halivni-zl"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/45"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3062"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3064,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3062\/revisions\/3064"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3036"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3062"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/utj.org\/viewpoints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}