/

UTJ Viewpoints
  • Find us on Facebook
  • Follow Us on Twitter
  • Watch us on YouTube
  • Follow Us on Instagram

The Orthodox Judaism of Sh’lomo Aviner

Denominations, Halakhah, Halakhah, Israel, Modern Judaism, Politics, Women's Forum

by Rabbi Alan J Yuter

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are that of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the Union for Traditional Judaism, unless otherwise indicated.

In his post on Jewish Values Online, Rabbi Alan J. Yuter analyses Rabbi Sh’lomo Aviner’s Orthodox Judaism, including Rabbi Aviner’s suggestion that the Notre Dame fire may have been divine retribution for  the 1242 burning of Jewish writings as well as Rabbi Aviner’s objection to women serving in the military and participating in politics in Israel.  Rabbi Yuter also addresses Rabbi Aviner’s opposition to wearing tkhelet and Rabbi Aviner’s standards of modesty for women’s clothing.

mAvot 1:11 advises Sages to be careful in choosing their words. This unverifiable theory, that the Notre Dame Church fire might be the Divine vengeance for the 1242 Talmud burning, [a] tells us nothing about “official” Jewish theology, [b] tells us a great deal about how R. Aviner constructs his spiritual world, [c] and he formulates an ideological narrative of a radical Jewish “otherness” that shapes the way in which he understands Torah and reads history, apparently without regard for how his words might impact anti-Semitic attitudes. …

R. Aviner adopts and advances the Haredi  narrative that [a] claims that the Torah texts are too deep and esoteric to be understood and applied by anyone other than Gedolei Torah, or great Torah sages, [b] since these Great Sages are believed to be divinely inspired, their rulings may not be subject to review, and [c] challenging these rabbis’ divinely inspired opinions is the moral equivalent of defying God. The Great Rabbis have determined that women’s military service is immodest.  But according to bSota 44b, in a defensive war in the land of Israel, i.e. a war of survival for the population and polity of the Jewish state, the Oral Torah requires that both bride and groom be drafted into the IDF.  …

R. Aviner also understands Psalms 45:14, “the entire dignity is the King’s daughter is in her interiority” to express of a presumed meta-Halakhjic norm, that dainty Jewish daughters dutifully do what they are told and make no claim to positions of authority in public Jewish life.  This descriptive passage is [mis]taken to empower select post-Talmudic rabbis to restrict all women’s public activity, rights, and privileges.   However, bKetubbot 58b reports that a woman is entitled to declare to her husband, “I waive my claim to financial support and will not service your personal needs.”  In other words, Jewish gender roles are habits of culture, and not Torah law. …

While communities do have a right to knowingly and willingly adopt hyper strict standards in order to address local conditions, it is improper to present one’s private proclivities about the other gender’s private parts as if those tastes are objective, uncontested Jewish law. Communal modesty standards are grounded in local taste, not public law, unless the Talmud explicitly rules otherwise.  One is required to cover what by local social convention is covered. … The Jewish modesty discipline is actually directed to the male, not the female, according to Micah 6:8.

Read more at http://jewishvaluescenter.org/jvoblog/Aviner

Enjoying UTJ Viewpoints?

UTJ relies on your support to promote an open-minded approach to Torah rooted in classical sources and informed by modern scholarship. Please consider making a generous donation to support our efforts.

Donate Now